[ home · entrance · contact · about me · what's new · fine art · digital art · cd cover · darkroom · photography · sculptures ]
[ back to main page 'writings by critics' ]   [ back to 'abstract expressionism' ]


wildbrush's art.to.day - you entered my world of art history -



Abstract Expressionism       
• The New York School      
Writings by Art-Critics       
- Clement Greenberg - 2 -     



Clement Greenberg

' "American-Type" Painting' in Art and Culture, Boston, Beacon Press, 1961, pp. 211, 2i2, 219; revised version of an article first appearing in Partisan Review, vol. 22, no. 2, Spring 1955, pp. 179-196



The first problem these young Americans seemed to share was that of loosening up the relatively delimited illusion of shallow depth that the three master cubists - Picasso, Braque, Leger - had adhered to since the closing out of synthetic cubism. If they were to be able to say what they had to say, they had also to loosen up that canon of rectilinear and curvilinear regularity in drawing and design which cubism had imposed on almost all previous abstract art.
These problems were not tackled by program; very little in 'abstract expressionism' is, or ever was, programmatic; individual artists may have made 'statements' but there were no manifestoes; nor have there been 'spokesmen.'
What happened, rather, was that a certain cluster of challenges was encountered, separately yet almost simultaneously, by six or seven painters who had their first one-man shows at Peggy Guggenheim's Art of This Century gallery in New York between 1943 and 1946. The Picassos of the thirties and in lesser but perhaps more crucial measure, the Kandinskys of 1910-18 were then suggesting new possibilities of expression for abstract and near-abstract art that went beyond the enormously inventive, but unfulfilled ideas of Klee's last decade. It was the unrealized Picasso rather than the unrealized Klee who became the important incentive for Americans like Gorky, de Kooning, and Pollock, all three of whom set out to catch, and to some extent did catch (or at least Pollock did) some of the uncaught hares that Picasso had started.

The years 1947 and 1948 constituted a turning-point for 'abstract expressionism.' In 1947 there was a great stride forward in general quality. Hofmann entered a new phase, and a different kind of phase, when he stopped painting on wood or fibreboard and began using canvas. In 1948 painters like Philip Guston and Bradley Walker Tomlin 'joined up,' to be followed two years later by Franz Kline. Rothko abandoned his 'surrealist' manner; de Kooning had his first show; and Gorky died. But it was only in 1950 that 'abstract expressionism' jelled as a general manifestation. And only then did two of its henceforth conspicuous features, the huge canvas and the black and white oil, become ratified.

back to Greenberg's critique page 1


divider line

[ back to main page 'writings by critics' ]   [ back to 'abstract expressionism' ]


[ home · entrance · contact · about me · what's new · fine art · digital art · cd cover · darkroom · photography · sculptures ]