[ home · entrance · contact · about me · what's new · fine art · digital art · cd cover · darkroom · photography · sculptures ]
[ back to main page 'writings by critics' ]   [ back to 'abstract expressionism' ]


wildbrush's art.to.day - you entered my world of art history -



Abstract Expressionism        
• The New York School      
Writings by Art-Critics       
- Meyer Schapiro - 2 -     



Meyer Schapiro

'The liberating quality of avant-garde art,'
Art News, vol. 56, no. 4, Summer 1957, pp. 38-39.

reprinted in 'The World Of Art Library General'
Maurice Tuchman, 'The New York School, Abstract Expressionism in the 40s and 50s'
© Thames & Hudson Ltd, London
ISBN 0-500-18112-8 - clothbound
ISBN 0-500-20106-4 - paperbound



The object of art is ... more passionately than ever before, the occasion of spontaneity or intense feeling. The painting symbolizes an individual who realizes freedom and deep engagement of the self within his work. It is addressed to others who will cherish it, if it gives them joy, and who will recognize in it an irreplaceable quality and will be attentive to every mark of the maker's imagination and feeling.

The consciousness of the personal and spontaneous in the painting and sculpture stimulates the artist to invent devices of handling, processing, surfacing, which confer to the utmost degree the aspect of the freely made. Hence the great importance of the mark, the stroke, the brush, the drip, the quality of
the substance of the paint itself, and the surface of the canvas as a texture and field of operation - all signs of the artist's active presence. The work of art is an ordered world of its own kind in which we are aware, at every point, of its becoming.

All these qualities of painting may be regarded as a means of affirming the individual in opposition to the contrary qualities of the ordinary experience of working and doing.
I need not speak in detail about this new manner, which appears in figurative as well as abstract art; but I think it is worth observing that in many ways it is a break with the kind of painting that was most important in the 1920s. After the First World War, in works like those of Léger, abstraction in art was affected by the taste for industry, technology, and science, and assumed the qualities of the machine-made, the impersonal and reproducible, with an air of coolness and mechanical control, intellectualized to some degree. The artist's power of creation seems analogous here to the designer's and engineer's. That art, in turn, avowed its sympathy with mechanism and industry in an optimistic mood as progressive elements in everyday life, and as examples of strength and precision in production which painters admired as a model for art itself. But the experiences of the last twenty-five years have made such confidence in the values of technology less interesting and even distasteful.

In abstraction we may distinguish those forms, like the square and circle, which have object character and those which do not. The first are closed shapes, distinct within their field and set off against a definite ground. They build up a space which has often elements of gravity, with a clear difference between above and below, the ground and the background, the near and far. But the art of the last fifteen years tends more often to work with forms which are open, fluid, or mobile; they are directed strokes or they are endless tangles and irregular curves, self-involved lines which impress us as possessing the qualities not so much of things as of impulses, of excited movements emerging and changing before our eyes.

The impulse, which is most often not readily visible in its pattern, becomes tangible and definite on the surface of a canvas through the painted mark. We see, as it were, the track of emotion, its obstruction, persistence, or extinction. But all these elements of impulse which seem at first so aimless on the canvas are built up into a whole characterized by firmness, often by elegance and beauty of shapes and colors. A whole emerges with a compelling, sometimes insistent quality of form, with a resonance of the main idea throughout the work. And possessing an extraordinary tangibility and force, often being so large that it covers the space of a wall and therefore competing boldly with the environment, the canvas can command our attention fully like monumental painting in the past.

It is also worth remarking that as the details of form become complicated and free and therefore hard to follow in their relation to one another, the painting tends to be more centered and compact - different in this respect from the type of abstraction in which the painting seems to be a balanced segment of a larger whole. The artist places himself in the focus of your space.

back to page 1 of Meyer Schapiro's critiques


divider line

[ back to main page 'writings by critics' ]   [ back to 'abstract expressionism' ]


[ home · entrance · contact · about me · what's new · fine art · digital art · cd cover · darkroom · photography · sculptures ]