[ home · entrance · contact · about me · what's new · fine art · digital art · cd cover · darkroom · photography · sculptures ]
[ back to main page 'writings by critics' ]   [ back to 'abstract expressionism' ]


wildbrush's art.to.day - you entered my world of art history -



Abstract Expressionism        
• The New York School      
Writings by Art-Critics       
- William Rubin -      



William Rubin

'Arshile Corky, Surrealism, and the New American Painting,' 
Art International
, vol. 7, no. 2, 25 February 1963, p. 27.

reprinted in 'The World Of Art Library General'
Maurice Tuchman, 'The New York School, Abstract Expressionism in the 40s and 50s'
© Thames & Hudson Ltd, London
ISBN 0-500-18112-8 - clothbound
ISBN 0-500-20106-4 - paperbound



In attempting to bring into focus the historical picture of the remarkable transition that characterized the decade of the 1940s, we might start with the year 1947. If we accept Willem de Kooning's generous statement, that it was 'Jackson Pollock [who] broke the ice,' the breakthrough surely dates from the winter of 1946-47, when Pollock first articulated his canvases with 'allover' webs of poured paint. Pollock had painted some beautiful pictures
in the early forties, but, unlike his later work, they are not 'world-historical' in the Hegelian sense; despite their originality, they do not possess his full identity, containing perhaps too much of Picasso, Miro, and Masson, to allow this.

De Kooning, Still, Motherwell, and Rothko, among others, also painted fine pictures in the early forties, but again, it was only during the period 1947-50 that they realized their more personal styles and painted what in some cases remain their best pictures.

The major influence on these American painters in the early forties was Picasso, but the most omnipresent and pervasive, though in generalized form, was surrealism, mostly Miro, secondarily Masson and Matta, and marginally Ernst and Arp (the illusionistic side of surrealist painting, as exemplified by Dali and Magritte, had no influence at all on these artists). But transcending the works of the surrealist painters were certain surrealist ideas relating picture-making to unconscious impulses and fantasies through the methods of automatism; these ideas never fully realized in surrealist painting itself - were very much in the air in the early and middle forties.
Gorky was by no means the first to come in contact with them; as early as 1940 Motherwell was exploring ideas like these in discussions with Matta, with whom he was then quite friendly, and the former soon brought them to the attention of Pollock. Within a few years such diverse painters as Still, Rothko, Gottlieb, Baziotes, and Newman were working in a manner that might well be termed quasi-surrealist (what the French call surréalisant). None were members of the surrealist group (although Motherwell and Baziotes were shown in a major surrealist exhibition), but the morphology of their work, its Freudianized mythological symbolism, and the flirtation with automatism, all seemed
related to surrealism. These were just the qualities (with the exception of automatism) which tended to be purged by the end of the decade.


divider line

[ back to main page 'writings by critics' ]   [ back to 'abstract expressionism' ]


[ home · entrance · contact · about me · what's new · fine art · digital art · cd cover · darkroom · photography · sculptures ]